when an investor’s favored political party held power in Washington, he or she generally increased holdings of risky stocks, shifted from foreign to domestic companies and traded less often. The opposite occurred when the preferred party was out of office.This makes sense when the government is able to change the rules of the game without warning.
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
The Politics of Economics
From the NYT:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are the reason why I do not write privately. I would love to hear your thoughts, whether you agree or not.