Saturday, February 28, 2009
1) The economy according to Mint.com.
2) A great place for seemingly low budget but good political interviews.
3) Over a 1/3 of police shootings are suicide by cop.
4) Maybe commercials make TV more enjoyable (could explain why TV online feels less than ideal).
5) Where a "stimulus" has already been tried and failed.
6) Why you shouldn't touch when you shop.
7) If their too big to fail, make them too big to exist.
8) A menstrual reminder for husbands.
9) A list of good things Obama has done so far.
10) Q & A on "Who Survives a Plane Crash?"
11) 40% of Americans own guns! (Thanks Justin)
12) How free Monty Python can bring profits.
13) An index of Marginal Revolution's "Markets in Everything" series.
14) Interview with a shoplifter.
15) Yet another reason why profits are good.
16) Wingsuit Base Jumping!
17) Clemson economics department ranks in top half.
18) Shopkeeper keeps store open when he's gone.
19) Should you tell your kids about the financial crisis?
20) My two favorite media sources in one room!
*Check my Bookmarks to see what I find interesting on a daily basis*
Thursday, February 26, 2009
PS: What would your letter to women/men look like?
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Joy Nedved currently resides in Amsterdam with her husband David. Before the global recession she worked for a local newspaper as a pub critic. Now she spends much of her time volunteering for the Amercian Women's Club of Amsterdam. She has graciously agreed to share her reflections on Obama's inauguration as seen from outside America. Oh, and she's my sister!
Living abroad has in many ways made me more appreciative of my homeland and at other times more chagrin, especially in social settings. Those of us living abroad found ourselves at dinner parties defending a president (Bush) and foreign policy that we neither voted for nor agreed upon during the pause between the aperitif course and first course. By the dessert course most of us were passing on the chocolate tart and asking for another glass of port. I don't even like port. Yet, six months ago the tenor of these parties changed, everyone wanted to know about Obama. Was it possible for the US to elect an African American president? No way, everyone exclaimed but secretly hoped. 90 percent of the Dutch population polled said that they would have voted for Obama if given the chance. The Dutch public broadcaster NPS devoted 8 hour long shows devoted to him in the 2 weeks before election night. There were at least 5 different "official" sold out election night parties where expats from all of the world stayed up until 6:00 am AMS time just to hear Obama's acceptance speech.
Hearing people sing, "I'm proud to be an American" in heavily accented voices will always bring a tear to my eye. Seeing non-Americans on Inauguration night holding the American flag and singing, "Simply the Best, America's better than all the rest" made my heart burst with patriotic pride. Is Obama the end all and be all of a New America? I don't know and right know I don't care because you see, here on this side of the Atlantic, We have Obamamania! This uninhibited media enthusiasm for an American president is a far cry from the coverage of the last 2 years of the Bush administration. Granted there was a lot to gripe about, Iraq, Iran, Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib- but somewhere along the way, the over sees anti-Bush attitude crossed over into the a more generalized anti-Americanism. We became a symbol of the big steroid bully picking on smaller, underdeveloped countries. Yet now. With this election people are starting to see America in a different perhaps more realistic light. Not that of an aggressive bully but as a protective brother willing to flex muscle but also willing to sit down and talk about disputes. As witnessed by Obama's first official phone call abroad to Palestinian President Abbas. This single yet important act proved to people that here is an American president willing to sit down and open up dialogue with his adversaries. It reminded people from all over the world that America is the land of free will, democracy and that all things are possible…this is the America that I'm proud of and will gladly discuss at the next dinner party sans the port.
Please contact me if you are interested in a guest post.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
After just seeing some of the best improvisers in the nation at the North Carolina Comedy Art Festival, I realized a problematic truth about improvisation:
1) good improv requires confident choices
2) already good improvisers are confident
3) inexperienced improvisers logically make fearful choices
Friday, February 20, 2009
1) Overall production (which is what really makes us rich/poor) may not actually be down as much as we think:
But when unemployment suddenly rises, as in a recession, people shift from work for pay to household production; people don’t take more leisure time than before.
So if we would measure output to include production at home, we would infer that a recession doesn’t reduce total output by as much as we thought; and perhaps the utility burden of a short recession is not as severe as one might imagine.
Economic cycles are Darwinian, picking off weak companies and leaving survivors stronger. A year into the recession, solid retailers have their pick of mall space. Respected banks are getting an influx of deposits. Tech companies with money to spend are having an easier time hiring.
You may have guessed by now what all this has to do with Wall Street. Like them or not, the men and women who’ve gone into finance in the past 10 or 20 years have certainly been among our best and brightest. They are super-well-educated and work incredibly hard, with intense focus. In economic terms, these people represent a huge stockpile of human capital — and now, some 200,000 or so of them are losing their jobs. Perhaps even more noteworthy, however, are the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of college undergrads and graduate students who had planned to work in finance.
During each recession cycle between 1968 and 2004, the rate of growth in evangelical churches jumped by 50 percent. By comparison, mainline Protestant churches continued their decline during recessions, though a bit more slowly.
we can know with absolute certainty that some governments must be overproviding what is called national defense; otherwise the service would not be needed in the first place. The overprovision is often a significant net loss of efficiency not only in the country "defended" but in other countries its government threatens.
the US has become the only remaining super-borrower, able to issue thousands of billions of dollars in debt at record low rates while the dollar strengthens. People are unwilling to lend to almost anybody except for the US Treasury.
FedEx, Microsoft, CNN, Wikipedia, HP, etc. Pre-existing companies can also make incredible gains in years where the economy is down, like Google, PayPal and Salesforce.com Inc.
Sure, it's stressful to miss a paycheck, but eliminating the stresses of a job may have some beneficial effects. Perhaps more important, people may take fewer car trips, thus lowering the risk of accidents, and spend less on alcohol and tobacco. They also have more time for exercise and sleep, and tend to choose home cooking over fast food. In a 2003 paper, “Healthy Living in Hard Times,” Christopher J. Ruhm, an economist at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, found that the death rate falls as unemployment rises. In the United States, he found, a 1 percent increase in the unemployment rate, on average, decreases the death rate by 0.5 percent.
Doing the annual pilgrimage to South Florida this holiday season, we’ve all been struck by how everywhere seems to be more crowded than usual. Parks, beaches, even stores are jammed. We could barely find a parking space at our favorite park, which is usually empty.
Could it be that with the down economy, people canceled or didn’t book expensive trips like cruises or ski vacations in favor of bunking with grandma and grandpa?
1. He intends for this recession to expose hidden sin and so bring us to repentance and cleansing.
2. He intends to wake us up to the constant and desperate condition of the developing world where there is always and only recession of the worst kind.
3. He intends to relocate the roots of our joy in his grace rather than in our goods, in his mercy rather than our money, in his worth rather than our wealth.
4. He intends to advance his saving mission in the world—the spread of the gospel and the growth of his church—precisely at a time when human resources are least able to support it. This is how he guards his glory.
5. He intends for the church to care for its hurting members and to grow in the gift of love.
Monday, February 16, 2009
The world is not ending. One of George Bush's final failures was his claim that he'd "abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system." This is just foolish. By the most economic measures this is not even the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. In fact, the panic of the 1980's was clearly worse than now (chart). Even on a global scale, the world is the best its ever been. For the first time in history, half the population of the world has reached the middle class. This is up from almost 2% 200 years ago. The idea that capitalism has failed us is simply not true. Llewellyn Rockwell, president of the Mises Institute, puts it this way:
To the free market, we owe all material prosperity, all our leisure time, our health and longevity, our huge and growing population, nearly everything we call life itself. Capitalism and capitalism alone has rescued the human race from degrading poverty, rampant sickness, and early death.
Below are a laundry list of problems I've accumulated with the stimulus package. Most of these ideas come from the 200 people smarter than me who signed the below statement:
Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of government, we do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan's "lost decade" in the 1990s. As such, it is a triumph of hope over experience to believe that more government spending will help the U.S. today. To improve the economy, policy makers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.
One of the points they mention is that Japan's recession, one similar to our current one, was not helped by increased government spending. In the 1980's Japan accumulated a debt twice the size of its economy only to remain stagnant. Many would claim that Japan built too many unneeded and slow spending projects, but that is unavoidable. As of January, in Obama's plan, only $4 of the $30 billion for roads and $3 of the $18 billion for renewable energy will be will be spent in the next two years. But speed is not the only problem. It is historically and geographically universal that governments are not very efficient at spending taxpayer money. Here are three recent examples:
Hurricane Katrina: ...the US has appropriated, over $100 billion in short and long term reconstruction grants, loan subsidies [etc]...GAO found that FEMA made over $1 billion--or 16% of the total in this particular category--in fraudulent payments...items like professional football tickets and Caribbean vacations.
The Big Dig: ...the largest single infrastructure project in the US...many lessons on how not to run a project...officially launched in 1982, but it did not break ground until 1991, due to environmental impact statements, technical difficulties and jurisdictional squabbles...not "completed" until 2007.
The efficiency of this bill is similar. It will spend $214.5 billion to create/save 330,400 government jobs. This is $646,214 per job. So why is this even on the table? What are the political incentives that make government spending seem like the solution in nations all around the world? I believe its because of bad politicians and bad voters. Bad politicians see this as a chance to pass the pork they've been trying to pass all along. And bad voters refuse to allow for "don't just do something; stand there."
So if government spending isn't the solution (and it surely isn't) then what is? Believe it or not there are some government action I do support. However it's important to note I support these all the time, not just in a recession. Economist Greg Mankiw proposes "an immediate and permanent reduction in the payroll tax, financed by a gradual, permanent, and substantial increase in the gasoline tax." This would not only help strengthen US business (1 year of pay roll tax is roughly equal to the stimulus package), but it would also deal with road congestion, which I have discussed before. Best of all this isn't like "mailing a letter to the fire department to tell them that your house is on fire." This could happen tomorrow, not 2011. Speed aside, here's why tax cuts will always out perform government spending:
This whole post can be summed up like this: Many wonder how we can fix the economy, but we fail to notice that it is already fixing itself. There were too many houses, people are now building less houses. Banks lent money to risky borrowers, now they're not. Americans weren't saving enough, now people are spending less. I predict we have positive economic growth in 2010.